top of page

Danis-Weber Classification of Ankle Fractures

ree

The Danis-Weber classification, also known simply as the Weber classification¹, is a widely used radiographic system for categorizing lateral ankle fractures. It is based on the location of the fibular fracture in relation to the syndesmosis of the ankle joint.

The classification is divided into three main categories, describing the level and type of fracture:

Weber A

  • Location: The fracture is below the level of the syndesmosis.

  • Characteristics:

    • Typically a stable fracture

    • Syndesmosis usually intact

    • Minimal ligament damage


Weber B

  • Location: The fracture occurs at the level of the syndesmosis.

  • Characteristics:

    • May be stable or unstable depending on severity

    • Possible syndesmotic injury


Weber C

  • Location: The fracture occurs above the level of the syndesmosis.

  • Characteristics:

    • Often unstable

    • Syndesmosis injured or torn

    • Frequently associated with medial malleolus fracture or deltoid ligament injury

ree

Clinical Relevance

  • Type A fractures are usually stable and often managed conservatively with cast immobilization or orthoses. Prognosis is generally favorable.

  • Type B and Type C fractures involve syndesmotic injury that may not be visible on plain X-ray. These are typically unstable fractures that more often require surgical fixation.

  • Careful assessment of syndesmotic and ligamentous injury is essential, as these factors strongly influence ankle stability and treatment choice.


Conclusion

The Danis-Weber classification provides a simple, radiology-based method for categorizing ankle fractures.

  • Type A: Usually stable, treated conservatively

  • Type B: Variable stability, may need surgery

  • Type C: Often unstable, typically requires surgical intervention

Correct classification and evaluation of syndesmotic involvement are critical for restoring ankle stability and function.


Sources:

  1. Kennedy JG, Johnson SM, Collins AL, DalloVedova P, McManus WF, Hynes DM, Walsh MG, Stephens MM. An evaluation of the Weber classification of ankle fractures. Injury. 1998 Oct 1;29(8):577-80.

  2. Goost H et al. Fractures of the Ankle Joint: Investigation and Treatment Options. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2014; 111(21): 377-388.fckLRhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4075279/

  3. Jason P. Tartaglione et al. Classifications in Brief: Lauge-Hansen Classification of Ankle Fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res (2015) 473:3323–3328

Tip: Use Ctrl + F to search on the page.

Help us keep PhysioDock free

All content on PhysioDock is free – but it costs to keep it running.

PhysioDock is built to be an open and accessible platform for physiotherapists, students, and patients alike. Here you’ll find articles, measurement tools, exercise libraries, diagnostic resources, and professional materials – all completely free.

Behind the scenes, however, there are hundreds of hours of work: research, writing, development, design, maintenance, testing, and updates. We do this because we believe in open knowledge and better health information.

If you’d like to support our work and help us continue developing and improving PhysioDock, we truly appreciate everyone who:
– subscribes to a PhysioDock+ membership
– uses and recommends PhysioDock in their work or studies
– shares PhysioDock with others

Every contribution makes a difference – and helps us keep the platform open to everyone.
Thank you for supporting PhysioDock!

Best value

PhysioDock+

NOK 199

199

Every month

PhysioDock+ gives you exclusive benefits such as discounts, AI tools, and professional resources. The membership helps you work more efficiently, stay updated, and save time and money in your daily practice.

Valid until canceled

Access to Fysio-Open

Physionews+

Quizzes

10% discount on all purchases

5% discount on "Website for Your Clinic"

50% discount on shipping

Access to PhysioDock-AI (Under development)

Partner discounts

Exclusive product discounts

Contact us

Is something incorrect?

Something missing?
Something you’d like to see added?
More recent literature?

Feel free to get in touch and let us know which article it concerns and what could be improved.
We truly appreciate your feedback!

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram

Thanks for contributing!

bottom of page