top of page

FABER Test (Patrick’s test)

The FABER test – an acronym for Flexion, Abduction, and External Rotation – is a passive clinical test designed to provoke pain and identify dysfunction in the hip joint, lumbar spine, or sacroiliac (SI) joint¹. It is used as a screening tool to evaluate persistent pain in the hip, groin, or lower back, and may also indicate irritation of the iliopsoas or pathology in the hip capsule or labrum².


By placing the leg in a “figure four” position and applying gentle pressure, mechanical stress is transferred through the femur to both the hip and sacroiliac joint, making it useful in differentiating intra-articular from periarticular pathology³.

Faber test

Test Position and Technique

Starting position:

  1. Patient lies supine.

  2. The tested leg is placed in figure-four position: flexion, abduction, and external rotation of the hip.

  3. The lateral malleolus rests on the opposite thigh, just above the knee⁴.


Execution:

  1. Examiner stabilizes the pelvis by holding the contralateral PSIS or ASIS.

  2. Gentle downward pressure is applied on the knee until end-range is reached.

  3. Small oscillations may be applied to assess pain at end-range.


Positive test criteria:

  • Reproduction of the patient’s familiar pain.

  • Clear restriction of motion⁵.


Interpretation of Findings

Pain in anterior hip or groin:

  • Iliopsoas irritation or spasm

  • Intra-articular hip pathology

  • Labral tear

  • Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI)

  • Hip osteoarthritis⁶

Pain in posterior hip or buttock:

  • Sacroiliac joint dysfunction

  • Sacroiliitis

  • Posterior hip impingement

  • Loose body or chondral lesion⁷

General stiffness or pain with external rotation:

  • Hip capsulitis or degenerative changes

  • Reproduction of neuropathic pain from lumbar pathology (e.g., referred pain from L2–L4)⁸


Clinical Relevance and Application

The FABER test is valuable in early clinical assessment but should never be used as a stand-alone diagnostic tool. It can guide further evaluation such as:

  • Imaging (MRI, X-ray)

  • Functional tests like hip quadrant or scour test

  • Mobility and pain provocation assessment⁹

Its strength lies in symptom reproduction, but it has limited value for identifying a specific cause without further testing¹⁰.


Evidence and Validity

Parameter

Result

Intrarater reliability with inclinometer

ICC 0.91¹¹

Sensitivity for hip pathology (arthroscopy)

0.89¹²

Sensitivity for labral tear

41% (low)

Specificity for labral tear

100% (high)¹³

Correlation with radiographic osteoarthritis

r = 0.54

Kappa (inter-examiner agreement)

0.63 (95% CI: 0.43–0.83)

Clinician agreement

84%¹¹

Assessment of evidence:

  • High specificity for certain conditions (e.g., labral tears).

  • Low sensitivity means a negative test does not rule out pathology¹³.

  • Inclinometer use improves reliability compared to visual assessment.

  • Evidence is mixed: some studies question the test’s utility, while others highlight its value when used in a test cluster¹⁴.


Summary

The FABER test is a simple yet widely applicable maneuver for assessing pain and stiffness in the hip, lumbar spine, and sacroiliac joint. It cannot serve as a sole diagnostic tool but provides valuable information when combined with history and additional tests. It is particularly useful for differentiating anterior from posterior hip pain and should be part of the standard clinical assessment in patients with nonspecific hip complaints.


Sources:

  1. Martin RL, Sekiya JK. The interrater reliability of 4 clinical tests used to assess individuals with musculoskeletal hip pain. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2008;38(2):71–77.

  2. Dutton M. Orthopaedic: Examination, Evaluation, and Intervention. 2nd ed. New York: The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc; 2008.

  3. Broadhurst NA, Bond MJ. Pain provocation tests for the assessment of sacroiliac joint dysfunction. J Spinal Disord. 1998;11(4):341–345.

  4. Philippon MJ, Stubbs AJ, Schenker ML, Maxwell RB, Ganz R, Leunig M. Arthroscopic management of femoroacetabular impingement: osteoplasty technique and literature review. Am J Sports Med. 2007;35(9):1571–1580.

  5. B, McCroy P, Brukner P, et al. Hip joint pathology: Clinical presentation and correlation between magnetic resonance arthrography, ultrasound, and arthroscopic findings in 25 consecutive cases. Clin J Sports Med. 2003;13:152–156.

  6. Reiman MP, Goode AP, Hegedus EJ, Cook CE, Wright AA. Diagnostic accuracy of clinical tests of the hip: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med. 2013;47(14):893–902.

  7. Tijssen M, van Cingel R, Willemsen L, de Visser E. Diagnostics of femoroacetabular impingement and labral pathology of the hip: a systematic review of the accuracy and validity of physical tests. Arthroscopy. 2012;28(6):860–871.

  8. Flynn T, Cleland J, Whitman J. User’s Guide to the Musculoskeletal Examination: Fundamentals for the Evidence-Based Clinician. Buckner, Kentucky: Evidence in Motion; 2008.

  9. Troelsen A, Mechlenburg I, Gelineck J, Bolvig L, Jacobsen S, Søballe K. What is the role of clinical tests and ultrasound in acetabular labral tear diagnostics? Acta Orthop. 2009;80(3):314–318.

  10. Faber Test | Patrick Faber’s Test for Hip Pain. Tilgjengelig fra: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nFza4MJv2Uo

  11. Bagwell JJ, Bauer L, Gradoz M, Grindstaff TL. The reliability of FABER test hip range of motion measurements. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2016;11(7):1101.

  12. Theiler R, Stucki G, Schotz R, Hofer H, Seifert B. Parametric and non-parametric measures in the assessment of knee and hip osteoarthritis: interobserver reliability and correlation with radiology. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 1996:35–42.

  13. Cattley P, Winyard J, Trevaskis J, Eaton S. Validity and reliability of clinical tests for the sacroiliac joint. A review of literature. Australas Chiropr Osteopathy. 2002;10(2):73–80.

  14. Vleeming A, Albert HB, Ostgaard HC, Sturesson B, Stuge B. European guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of pelvic girdle pain. Eur Spine J. 2008;17(6):794–819.

Tip: Use Ctrl + F to search on the page.

Help us keep PhysioDock free

All content on PhysioDock is free – but it costs to keep it running.

PhysioDock is built to be an open and accessible platform for physiotherapists, students, and patients alike. Here you’ll find articles, measurement tools, exercise libraries, diagnostic resources, and professional materials – all completely free.

Behind the scenes, however, there are hundreds of hours of work: research, writing, development, design, maintenance, testing, and updates. We do this because we believe in open knowledge and better health information.

If you’d like to support our work and help us continue developing and improving PhysioDock, we truly appreciate everyone who:
– subscribes to a PhysioDock+ membership
– uses and recommends PhysioDock in their work or studies
– shares PhysioDock with others

Every contribution makes a difference – and helps us keep the platform open to everyone.
Thank you for supporting PhysioDock!

Best value

PhysioDock+

NOK 199

199

Every month

PhysioDock+ gives you exclusive benefits such as discounts, AI tools, and professional resources. The membership helps you work more efficiently, stay updated, and save time and money in your daily practice.

Valid until canceled

Access to Fysio-Open

Physionews+

Quizzes

10% discount on all purchases

5% discount on "Website for Your Clinic"

50% discount on shipping

Access to PhysioDock-AI (Under development)

Partner discounts

Exclusive product discounts

Contact us

Is something incorrect?

Something missing?
Something you’d like to see added?
More recent literature?

Feel free to get in touch and let us know which article it concerns and what could be improved.
We truly appreciate your feedback!

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram

Thanks for contributing!

bottom of page