top of page

Hawkins-Kennedy Impingement Test

The Hawkins-Kennedy Impingement Test is used to identify subacromial impingement syndrome, a condition in which shoulder structures such as the supraspinatus tendon and subacromial bursa become compressed between the acromion and the humeral head¹. This test is one of the most widely used provocative maneuvers in the clinical assessment of shoulder pain.

ree

Technique

The test is performed with the patient either seated or standing.

  • Patient position: The arm is elevated to 90 degrees of shoulder abduction with the elbow flexed to 90 degrees.

  • Execution: The examiner stabilizes the patient’s arm and then applies a passive internal rotation of the shoulder.

A test is considered positive if the patient reports pain during this movement¹.

This pain response reflects narrowing of the subacromial space, which can irritate soft tissues such as the supraspinatus tendon, subacromial bursa, or long head of the biceps tendon.


Interpretation of Results

  • Positive test: Pain reproduced during internal rotation → suggests subacromial impingement, and may reflect irritation or inflammation of supraspinatus, bursa, or biceps tendon.

  • Negative test: No pain reported → impingement becomes less likely, though cannot be fully excluded.

A positive finding alone is not sufficient for a conclusive diagnosis, but it adds value when interpreted in the clinical context.


Diagnostic Accuracy

The Hawkins-Kennedy Test has shown variable accuracy across studies²³⁴. To better illustrate, the following table summarizes its diagnostic parameters:

Parameter

Reported Value

Clinical Implication

Sensitivity

62–92%

Good ability to detect impingement (useful for screening)

Specificity

25–100%

Wide variation; a positive test alone is not definitive

Positive LR (+LR)

1.20–3.33

Moderate diagnostic value if positive

Negative LR (–LR)

0.21–0.55

Good ability to rule out impingement if negative

In summary: high sensitivity makes the test valuable for detecting impingement, but low specificity limits its stand-alone diagnostic reliability.


Test Item Cluster

The Hawkins-Kennedy Test becomes significantly more reliable when combined with other shoulder impingement tests²³:

  • Painful Arc Sign

  • Infraspinatus Test

Cluster interpretation:

  • Three positive tests: +LR = 10.56 → strong probability of impingement.

  • Three negative tests: –LR = 0.17 → strong probability that impingement is not present.

  • Two positive tests: +LR = 5.03 → moderate diagnostic value.

This cluster approach is strongly recommended for clinical practice.


Clinical Relevance

The Hawkins-Kennedy Test should be understood as part of a test battery rather than a diagnostic endpoint. It is particularly helpful:

  • In athletes performing repetitive overhead movements (swimming, tennis, throwing sports).

  • In patients with chronic shoulder pain, where subacromial impingement is suspected.

When interpreted alongside patient history, physical examination, and other provocative tests, it provides strong clinical value.


Summary

  • High sensitivity → effective screening tool.

  • Low specificity → cannot confirm impingement alone.

  • Strong diagnostic accuracy when combined with Painful Arc Sign and Infraspinatus Test.

  • Best used within a cluster of tests for shoulder evaluation.


References

  1. Flynn, T.W., Cleland, J.A., Whitman, J.M. (2008). User's guide to the musculoskeletal examination: Fundamentals for the evidence-based clinician. Buckner, Kentucky: Evidence in Motion

  2. Shoulder joint video - © Kenhub https://www.kenhub.com/en/study/anatomy-glenohumeral-joint

  3. Park, H.B., Yokota, A., Gill, H.S., EI RG, McFarland, E.G. (2005). Diagnostic accuracy of clinical tests for the different degrees of subacromial impingement syndrome. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 87(7), 1446-1455.

  4. Mustafa et al. Diagnostic values of clinical diagnostic tests in subacromial impingement syndrome. Ann Rheum Dis 2000;59;44-47

  5. Dutton, M. (2008). Orthopaedic: Examination, evaluation, and intervention (2nd ed.). New York: The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.

Tip: Use Ctrl + F to search on the page.

Help us keep PhysioDock free

All content on PhysioDock is free – but it costs to keep it running.

PhysioDock is built to be an open and accessible platform for physiotherapists, students, and patients alike. Here you’ll find articles, measurement tools, exercise libraries, diagnostic resources, and professional materials – all completely free.

Behind the scenes, however, there are hundreds of hours of work: research, writing, development, design, maintenance, testing, and updates. We do this because we believe in open knowledge and better health information.

If you’d like to support our work and help us continue developing and improving PhysioDock, we truly appreciate everyone who:
– subscribes to a PhysioDock+ membership
– uses and recommends PhysioDock in their work or studies
– shares PhysioDock with others

Every contribution makes a difference – and helps us keep the platform open to everyone.
Thank you for supporting PhysioDock!

Best value

PhysioDock+

NOK 199

199

Every month

PhysioDock+ gives you exclusive benefits such as discounts, AI tools, and professional resources. The membership helps you work more efficiently, stay updated, and save time and money in your daily practice.

Valid until canceled

Access to Fysio-Open

Physionews+

Quizzes

10% discount on all purchases

5% discount on "Website for Your Clinic"

50% discount on shipping

Access to PhysioDock-AI (Under development)

Partner discounts

Exclusive product discounts

Contact us

Is something incorrect?

Something missing?
Something you’d like to see added?
More recent literature?

Feel free to get in touch and let us know which article it concerns and what could be improved.
We truly appreciate your feedback!

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram

Thanks for contributing!

bottom of page