top of page

Thessaly Test

Thessaly-testen er en dynamisk klinisk test som benyttes for å identifisere meniskskader. Testen reproduserer belastning på kneet for å fremprovosere symptomer på medial eller lateral meniskskade. Et positivt funn innebærer leddsmerte langs leddlinjen eller følelse av låsing/fanging i kneet [1].

Thessaly Test

Execution Technique

Patient position:The patient stands on one leg while holding the examiner’s outstretched hands for support.

Test procedure:

  • The patient flexes the knee to  and rotates the body medially and laterally three times.

  • The test is repeated at 20° knee flexion.

  • The test begins on the uninjured side to familiarize the patient with the procedure.

  • Positive test: The patient experiences joint line pain or a sensation of locking/catching.



Evidence and Diagnostic Value

Karachalios et al. (2005) reported high sensitivity and specificity at 20° flexion:

Thessaly Test at 5° Flexion

Injury Type

Sensitivity

Specificity

+LR

-LR

Medial meniscus

66%

96%

16.5

0.35

Lateral meniscus

81%

91%

9.0

0.21

Combined ACL + meniscus

65%

83%

Thessaly Test at 20° Flexion

Injury Type

Sensitivity

Specificity

+LR

-LR

Medial meniscus

89%

97%

29.67

0.11

Lateral meniscus

92%

96%

23.0

0.21

Combined ACL + meniscus

80%

91%

Later studies (2015–2016) have shown that the Thessaly Test may not outperform McMurray’s or Apley’s tests【3】【4】【5】.

  • Snoeker et al. (2015): Moderate inter-rater reliability (Kappa = 0.54)【4】.

Thessaly Test in Newer Studies (2015–2016)

Metric

Sensitivity

Specificity

+LR

-LR

Range values

0.64–0.66

0.39–0.53

1.37

0.67

Clinical Significance

  • The Thessaly Test is a quick and simple tool to evaluate meniscal pathology.

  • It demonstrates higher diagnostic value at 20° flexion.

  • For a more reliable diagnosis, the test should be combined with McMurray’s and Apley’s tests.


Sources:

  1. Karachalios T, Hantes M, Zibis AH, Zachos V, Karantanas AH, Malizos KN. Diagnostic accuracy of a new clinical test (the Thessaly test) for early detection of meniscal tears. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87(5):955-962.

  2.  Illustration from Anatomy & Physiology, Connexions Web site. http://cnx.org/content/col11496/1.6/, Jun 19, 2013.

  3. Goossens P, Keijsers E, Van Geenen RJ, Zijta A, Van den Broek M, Verhagen AP, Scholten-Peeters GG. Validity of the Thessaly test in evaluating meniscal tears compared with arthroscopy: a diagnostic accuracy study. journal of orthopaedic & sports physical therapy. 2015 Jan;45(1):18-24.

  4. Snoeker BA, Lindeboom R, Zwinderman AH, Vincken PW, Jansen JA, Lucas C. Detecting Meniscal Tears in Primary Care: Reproducibility and Accuracy of 2 Weight-Bearing Tests and 1 Non–Weight-Bearing Test. The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy. 2015 Sep 1;45(9):693-702.

  5. Blyth M, Anthony I, Francq B, Brooksbank K, Downie P, Powell A, Jones B, MacLean A, McConnachie A, Norrie J. Diagnostic accuracy of the Thessaly test, standardised clinical history and other clinical examination tests (Apley's, McMurray's and joint line tenderness) for meniscal tears in comparison with magnetic resonance imaging diagnosis. Health Technology Assessment. 2015.

  6. Décary S, Ouellet P, Vendittoli PA, Desmeules F. Reliability of physical examination tests for the diagnosis of knee disorders: Evidence from a systematic review. Man Ther. 2016 Dec;26:172-182. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2016.09.007.

Tip: Use Ctrl + F to search on the page.

Help us keep PhysioDock free

All content on PhysioDock is free – but it costs to keep it running.

PhysioDock is built to be an open and accessible platform for physiotherapists, students, and patients alike. Here you’ll find articles, measurement tools, exercise libraries, diagnostic resources, and professional materials – all completely free.

Behind the scenes, however, there are hundreds of hours of work: research, writing, development, design, maintenance, testing, and updates. We do this because we believe in open knowledge and better health information.

If you’d like to support our work and help us continue developing and improving PhysioDock, we truly appreciate everyone who:
– subscribes to a PhysioDock+ membership
– uses and recommends PhysioDock in their work or studies
– shares PhysioDock with others

Every contribution makes a difference – and helps us keep the platform open to everyone.
Thank you for supporting PhysioDock!

Best value

PhysioDock+

NOK 199

199

Every month

PhysioDock+ gives you exclusive benefits such as discounts, AI tools, and professional resources. The membership helps you work more efficiently, stay updated, and save time and money in your daily practice.

Valid until canceled

Access to Fysio-Open

Physionews+

Quizzes

10% discount on all purchases

5% discount on "Website for Your Clinic"

50% discount on shipping

Access to PhysioDock-AI (Under development)

Partner discounts

Exclusive product discounts

Contact us

Is something incorrect?

Something missing?
Something you’d like to see added?
More recent literature?

Feel free to get in touch and let us know which article it concerns and what could be improved.
We truly appreciate your feedback!

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram

Thanks for contributing!

bottom of page