top of page

Copenhagen Neck Functional Disability Scale (CNFDS)

The Copenhagen Neck Functional Disability Scale (CNFDS) is a self-administered questionnaire developed to measure functional limitations in patients with neck pain. The scale was created by Jordan et al. in 1998 and is partly based on the Neck Disability Index (NDI) and the Low Back Pain Rating Scale¹.

Mann med nakkesmerter som holder seg i nakken

Target Group

CNFDS was designed to improve the generalizability of the Neck Disability Index in European populations⁷. It is used for patients with:

  • Chronic neck pain

  • Cervical disc herniation

  • Mechanical neck pain

  • Patients undergoing physiotherapy³

The test has been validated for patients aged 20 to 75 years⁷.


Method

The scale consists of 15 questions, with three possible answers:

  • “Yes,” “Sometimes,” or “No.”

Scoring is structured as follows:

  • Items 1–5: “Yes” = good function

  • Items 6–15: “No” = good function

Point allocation:

  • 0 points = good function

  • 1 point = moderate function

  • 2 points = poor function

Total score:

  • 0 = no neck disability

  • 30 = maximum functional disability³

Scores can be compared as raw scores or expressed as percentage change from baseline³.


Validity and Reliability

Reliability

  • Test–retest reliability:

    • Same day: Pearson r = 0.99

    • Two days later: Pearson r = 0.98

  • Internal consistency: Cronbach’s α = 0.90, indicating excellent reliability³,⁷.


Validity

  • Construct validity: Measures functional limitations due to neck pain³.

  • Comparison with patient self-rating: Spearman r = 0.89 (high)³.

  • Comparison with physician rating: Spearman r = 0.56 (moderate)³,⁷.

  • Correlation with VAS pain scores:

    • CNFDS and current pain: r = 0.45

    • CNFDS and worst pain: r = 0.37

    • CNFDS and average pain: r = 0.19⁸.


Responsiveness

  • Responsiveness to the NDI, Northwick Park Pain Questionnaire, and Neck Pain and Disability Scale is nearly identical (SRM = 0.89, p < 0.01)⁴.

  • Correlation with pain scores over time:

    • 6 weeks: r = 0.49, p < 0.0001

    • 4 months: r = 0.48, p < 0.0001

    • 12 months: r = 0.54, p < 0.0001³,⁷,⁹.


Other Factors

  • No floor or ceiling effects observed⁶,⁵.

  • No gender or age differences in scoring³.

  • No established minimal clinically important difference (MCID) reported⁷.


Conclusion

The CNFDS is a reliable and validated tool for assessing functional disability in patients with neck pain. It is simple to administer, takes about 10 minutes, and can be delivered via paper, mail, or telephone. The questionnaire demonstrates high test–retest reliability and strong agreement with patients’ self-perceived disability.


Kilder:

  1. FEJER, R., JORDAN, A. & HARTVIGSEN, J. 2005. Categorising the severity of neck pain: establishment of cut-points for use in clinical and epidemiological research. Pain, 119, 176-82.

  2. PICKERING, P. M., OSMOTHERLY, P. G., ATTIA, J. R. & MCELDUFF, P. 2011. An examination of outcome measures for pain and dysfunction in the cervical spine: a factor analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 36, 581-8. (level of evidence 2C)

  3. JORDAN, A., MANNICHE, C., MOSDAL, C. & HINDSBERGER, C. 1998. The Copenhagen Neck Functional Disability Scale: a study of reliability and validity. J Manipulative Physiol Ther, 21, 520-7.

  4. KOSE, G., HEPGULER, S., ATAMAZ, F. & ODER, G. 2007. A comparison of four disability scales for Turkish patients with neck pain. J Rehabil Med, 39, 358-62.

  5. SCHELLINGERHOUT, J. M., VERHAGEN, A. P., HEYMANS, M. W., KOES, B. W., DE VET, H. C. & TERWEE, C. B. 2012. Measurement properties of disease-specific questionnaires in patients with neck pain: a systematic review. Qual Life Res, 21, 659-70.

  6. MISTERSKA, E., JANKOWSKI, R. & GLOWACKI, M. 2011. Cross-cultural adaptation of the Neck Disability Index and Copenhagen Neck Functional Disability Scale for patients with neck pain due to degenerative and discopathic disorders. Psychometric properties of the Polish versions. BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 12, 84. .

  7. PIETROBON, R., COEYTAUX, R. R., CAREY, T. S., RICHARDSON, W. J. & DEVELLIS, R. F. 2002. Standard scales for measurement of functional outcome for cervical pain or dysfunction: a systematic review. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 27, 515-22.

  8. FORESTIER, R., FRANCON, A., ARROMAN, F. S. & BERTOLINO, C. 2007. French version of the Copenhagen neck functional disability scale. Joint Bone Spine, 74, 155-9.

  9. FERREIRA, M. L., BORGES, B. M., REZENDE, I. L., CARVALHO, L. P., SOARES, L. P., DABES, R. A., CARVALHO, G., DRUMMOND, A. S., MACHADO, G. C. & FERREIRA, P. H. 2010. Are neck pain scales and questionnaires compatible with the international classification of functioning, disability and health? A systematic review. Disabil Rehabil, 32, 1539-46.

Tip: Use Ctrl + F to search on the page.

Help us keep PhysioDock free

All content on PhysioDock is free – but it costs to keep it running.

PhysioDock is built to be an open and accessible platform for physiotherapists, students, and patients alike. Here you’ll find articles, measurement tools, exercise libraries, diagnostic resources, and professional materials – all completely free.

Behind the scenes, however, there are hundreds of hours of work: research, writing, development, design, maintenance, testing, and updates. We do this because we believe in open knowledge and better health information.

If you’d like to support our work and help us continue developing and improving PhysioDock, we truly appreciate everyone who:
– subscribes to a PhysioDock+ membership
– uses and recommends PhysioDock in their work or studies
– shares PhysioDock with others

Every contribution makes a difference – and helps us keep the platform open to everyone.
Thank you for supporting PhysioDock!

Best value

PhysioDock+

NOK 199

199

Every month

PhysioDock+ gives you exclusive benefits such as discounts, AI tools, and professional resources. The membership helps you work more efficiently, stay updated, and save time and money in your daily practice.

Valid until canceled

Access to Fysio-Open

Physionews+

Quizzes

10% discount on all purchases

5% discount on "Website for Your Clinic"

50% discount on shipping

Access to PhysioDock-AI (Under development)

Partner discounts

Exclusive product discounts

Contact us

Is something incorrect?

Something missing?
Something you’d like to see added?
More recent literature?

Feel free to get in touch and let us know which article it concerns and what could be improved.
We truly appreciate your feedback!

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram

Thanks for contributing!

bottom of page