Physical Activity and the Interdisciplinary Team

Patient care often produces better outcomes when several health professions collaborate in assessment and treatment. Such a model allows different professionals to combine their knowledge and skills in order to provide more comprehensive patient management. Research shows that collaboration between multiple professions can lead to improved treatment outcomes as well as more efficient use of healthcare resources¹.

This collaborative approach is commonly referred to as an interdisciplinary team, where professionals from different disciplines participate in the planning and delivery of patient care. The term “interdisciplinary” refers to the integration of knowledge and skills from different professional fields².

To understand how such teams function in practice, it is also necessary to clarify what is meant by a team within the healthcare context.

What Is a Team?

A team can be described as a group of individuals who work together to deliver services or achieve specific outcomes for which they share responsibility³. In a healthcare setting, this means that team members work toward common treatment goals and collaborate closely on decisions that affect patient management.

A well-functioning team is typically characterized by:

• shared goals for patient care

• continuous communication between professionals

• clearly defined responsibilities

• interdependence between team members

When these elements are present, the team can effectively utilize the expertise of each profession to strengthen the overall quality of care.

Interdisciplinary Collaboration and Parallel Professional Approaches

Collaboration between healthcare professionals can be organized in several ways. In some models, professionals work more in parallel, where each discipline assesses and treats the patient from its own professional perspective. In these cases, the patient may attend separate consultations with different professionals, while the professionals later discuss findings and future management in team meetings.

Interdisciplinary teams, however, often involve a more integrated approach. Multiple professionals may participate simultaneously in the assessment and planning of treatment, and the patient is frequently involved directly in discussions regarding goals and interventions.

Physical Activity and Health

Physical activity is a key determinant of health throughout the lifespan. The term refers to any bodily movement produced by skeletal muscles that results in energy expenditure⁶⁷. Physical activity can include both structured exercise and everyday movement.

The importance of physical activity applies to individuals of all ages and levels of functional ability⁴⁵. Regular activity contributes to improved physical capacity, enhanced functional ability, and better quality of life.

Health Benefits of Physical Activity

Regular physical activity has been shown to reduce the risk of several chronic diseases and health problems. Among the most well-documented benefits are reduced risks of:

• premature mortality

• cardiovascular disease

• hypertension

• diabetes mellitus

• certain types of cancer

• obesity

• psychological stress

• musculoskeletal disorders⁸

Research also demonstrates that almost all individuals can benefit from regular physical activity, whether the activity is moderate or vigorous⁹. Even among frail or older adults, physical activity can lead to improvements in mobility and functional capacity¹⁰.

Physiological Effects of Physical Activity

Regular physical activity influences several important physiological mechanisms within the body.

Some of the most significant effects include:

• reduced blood pressure¹¹¹²

• improved body composition and reduced abdominal adiposity¹³

• improved lipid profile, including lower triglycerides and LDL cholesterol and increased HDL cholesterol⁹

• enhanced glucose uptake in skeletal muscle¹⁴

• improved autonomic regulation of cardiac function¹⁵

• reduced systemic inflammation¹⁶

Together, these physiological adaptations contribute to reduced risk of chronic disease and improved overall health.

Interdisciplinary Teams in Promoting Physical Activity

The Importance of Interdisciplinary Collaboration in Physical Activity Promotion

In modern healthcare systems, it is widely recognized that no single profession can address all aspects of human health. Prevention, treatment, and health promotion often require expertise from multiple disciplines. This is particularly relevant in efforts to increase levels of physical activity within the population.

The role of physical activity in disease prevention and health promotion is well documented in scientific literature¹⁷¹⁸⁷⁸. Regular activity is associated with reduced risk of chronic disease while also improving physical function, mental health, and overall quality of life.

International guidelines recommend that individuals maintain adequate levels of physical activity throughout life in terms of both intensity and frequency. Despite these recommendations, several studies indicate that physical activity levels tend to decline during adulthood¹⁹¹⁸. This highlights the need for systematic efforts to promote physical activity.

Promoting physical activity cannot be the responsibility of a single profession alone. Effective health promotion requires collaboration across multiple professional sectors and disciplines.

Professions Involved in Physical Activity Promotion

Interdisciplinary efforts to promote physical activity can involve a wide range of professionals, each contributing specific knowledge and perspectives.

Examples of relevant professions include:

• physiotherapists

• physicians

• nurses

• midwives

• public health nurses

• teachers

• dietitians

• psychologists and psychotherapists

• fitness and exercise professionals

• community health workers

• health policy makers

Collaboration between these actors can help develop more comprehensive strategies to increase physical activity within the population.

Benefits of Interdisciplinary Teams in Physical Activity Promotion

When multiple professions collaborate to promote physical activity, several organizational and professional benefits may arise.

Key advantages include:

• shared goals related to increasing population physical activity

• pooling expertise from different professional fields

• improved ability to identify and address barriers to participation in physical activity

• development of innovative strategies for promoting activity

• mutual motivation among professionals working in health promotion

• improved coordination between organizations and sectors that would otherwise work independently

Interdisciplinary collaboration can also increase understanding of each profession’s competencies and responsibilities. This may reduce professional conflicts and clarify role boundaries.

In addition, such collaboration can provide improved access to professional networks, better coordination of resources, and more efficient planning of interventions. These factors can ultimately enhance the quality of services delivered to the population².

Barriers to Interdisciplinary Collaboration in Physical Activity Promotion

Despite the advantages of interdisciplinary teamwork, several challenges may limit the effectiveness of such collaborations.

Common barriers include:

• lack of commitment or prioritization among certain stakeholders

• differing professional perspectives and priorities

• professional rivalry or conflict

• unequal contributions among team members

• lack of relevant expertise among some participants

• absence of clearly defined and achievable shared goals²⁰

Another important challenge concerns the dissemination of information among participants in large collaborative networks. Effective communication and access to data are essential for successful collaboration²¹.

Geographical and organizational boundaries may also influence the success of collaborative initiatives. For example, differences in administrative structures between local authorities and health services may complicate coordination if they serve different population groups²².

Competition between organizations may also create difficulties in collaborative projects. This can occur particularly when public and private institutions operate within the same field but have different financial or organizational interests²³.

To address such challenges, health promotion initiatives must develop new forms of collaboration, strengthen communication between stakeholders, and reconsider traditional approaches to organizing health promotion activities²¹.

References

1. Mitchell GK, Tieman JJ, Shelby-James TM. Multidisciplinary care planning and teamwork in primary care. Medical Journal of Australia. 2008;188(8):S61–S64.

2. Payne M. Teamwork in Multi-professional Care. London: Palgrave; 2000.

3. Mohrman SA, Cohen SG, Mohrman AM Sr. Designing Team-Based Organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 1995.

4. World Health Organization. Global Recommendations on Physical Activity for Health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2010.

5. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 2008. Available at: http://health.gov/paguidelines/guidelines/chapter2.aspx (accessed 22 April 2018).

6. Caspersen CJ, Powell KE, Christenson GM. Physical activity, exercise and physical fitness: definitions and distinctions for health-related research. Public Health Reports. 1985;100(2):126–131.

7. World Health Organization. Global NCD Infobase. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2014.

8. Lee DC, Pate RR, Lavie CJ, Sui X, Church TS, Blair SN. Leisure-time running reduces all-cause and cardiovascular mortality risk. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2014;64(5).

9. Warburton DER, Nicol CW, Bredin SSD. Health benefits of physical activity: the evidence. Canadian Medical Association Journal. 2006;174:801–809.

10. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Healthy People 2002: National Health Promotion and Disease Prevention Objectives. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 2002.

11. Dimeo F, Pagonas N, Seibert F, Arndt R, Zidek W, Westhoff TH. Aerobic exercise reduces blood pressure in resistant hypertension. Hypertension. 2012;60(3):653–658.

12. Juraschek SP, Blaha MJ, Whelton SP, Blumenthal R, Jones SR, Keteyian SJ, et al. Physical fitness and hypertension in a population at risk for cardiovascular disease: the Henry Ford Exercise Testing (FIT) Project. Journal of the American Heart Association. 2014;3(6):e001268.

13. Maiorana A, O’Driscoll G, Taylor R. Exercise and the nitric oxide vasodilator system. Sports Medicine. 2003;33:1013–1035.

14. Hill JO, Wyatt HR. Role of physical activity in preventing and treating obesity. Journal of Applied Physiology. 2005;99:765–770.

15. Tiukinhoy S, Beohar N, Hsieh M. Improvement in heart rate recovery after cardiac rehabilitation. Journal of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation. 2003;23:84–87.

16. Adamopoulos S, Parissis J, Kroupis C. Physical training reduces peripheral markers of inflammation in patients with chronic heart failure. European Heart Journal. 2001;22:791–797.

17. Ayanniyi O, Fabunmi AA, Akinpelu OO. Effect of age on physical activity levels among teachers in selected secondary schools, Ibadan, Nigeria. Medicina Sportiva. 2012;8(4):1978–1982.

18. Oyeyemi AL, Oyeyemi AY, Jidda ZA, Babagana F. Prevalence of physical activity among adults in a metropolitan Nigerian city: a cross-sectional study. Journal of Epidemiology. 2013;23(3):169–177.

19. Agha SY, Al-Dabbagh SA. Level of physical activity among teaching and support staff in the education sector in Dohuk, Iraq. Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal. 2010;16(12).

20. Naidoo J, Wills J. Health Promotion: Foundations for Practice. London: Bailliere Tindall; 2001.

21. Tzenalis A, Sotiriadou C. Health promotion as multi-professional and multidisciplinary work. International Journal of Caring Sciences. 2010;3(2):49–55.

22. Heitkemper M, McGrath B, Killien M, Jarrett M, Landis C, Lentz M, Woods N, Hayward K. The role of centers in fostering interdisciplinary research. Nursing Outlook. 2008;56(3):115–122.

23. Scriven A, Orme J. Health Promotion: Professional Perspectives. London: Macmillan / The Open University; 1996.