Weber’s Two-Point Discrimination Test

Weber’s Two-Point Discrimination Test is used to evaluate tactile perception of the skin by measuring the minimal distance at which two distinct points can be perceived as separate. The test provides insight into sensory innervation of specific skin regions and is widely applied in neurological examinations【1】【2】.

Clinical Importance

The test is clinically significant for:

• Detecting pathological changes in spatial acuity following trauma, chronic pain, or neurological disorders.

• Serving as a prognostic tool for monitoring outcomes after nerve repair, carpal tunnel surgery, or finger replantation【4】.

By quantifying tactile discrimination, the test helps differentiate between intact, impaired, or absent cutaneous sensation.

Test Procedure

Patient Position

• Patient closes their eyes to prevent visual input.

• The tested hand or skin region is immobilized on a firm surface for accuracy【1】.

Execution

• Examiner uses a paperclip, caliper, or two-point discriminator【5】.

• Two points are applied longitudinally or transversely on the skin with uniform pressure (avoiding blanching of skin)【6】.

• Distance between points is gradually reduced until the patient reports no distinction.

• Patient identifies whether one or two points are perceived.

• Threshold distance is recorded as the two-point discrimination value.

Controls

• Test repeated multiple times for consistency.

• Performed bilaterally for comparison.

Interpretation of Results

Normal Thresholds by Region【12】【13】

Body Region	Normal Threshold (mm)
Fingertips	2–8 mm
Lips	2–4 mm
Palm	8–12 mm
Leg/Back	30–40 mm

Classification of Discrimination Ability【14】

• Normal: < 6 mm

• Fair: 6–10 mm

• Poor: 11–15 mm

• Protective sensation: Only one point perceived

• Anesthesia: No perception of stimulus

Neurological Considerations

Impaired two-point discrimination may indicate dysfunction of the dorsal column-medial lemniscus pathway or peripheral nerves, commonly seen in:

• Peripheral nerve compression (e.g., carpal tunnel syndrome)

• Sensory neuropathy (e.g., diabetic polyneuropathy)

• Spinal cord lesions involving dorsal column pathways

Diagnostic Validity and Evidence

Strengths

• Widely used as a standard sensory assessment in hand and neurological examinations.

• Provides quantitative data on tactile acuity.

Limitations

• Inter-rater reliability varies due to differences in applied pressure【15】.

• Lack of standardization reduces test accuracy.

• Pressure inconsistency can result in false positives or negatives.

Conclusion

Weber’s Two-Point Discrimination Test is a simple and widely used sensory test for evaluating tactile acuity, particularly in the hands and fingertips. It is clinically valuable in assessing neurological injury and recovery after surgical interventions. However, its reliability is influenced by examiner technique and standardization, meaning results should always be interpreted alongside other sensory and neurological assessments.

Sources:

1. Blumenfeld, Hal . Neuroanatomy through Clinical Cases. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates, Inc. pp. 71–72. 2010 .

2.  Bickley, Lynn; Szilagui, Peter . Bates' Guide to Physical Examination and History Taking (9th ed.). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. ISBN . 2007

3. Shooter D. Use of two‐point discrimination as a nerve repair assessment tool: preliminary report. ANZ journal of surgery. 2005 Oct;75(10):866-8.

4. Frahm KS, Gervasio S. The two-point discrimination threshold depends both on the stimulation noxiousness and modality. Exp Brain Res. 2021 May;239(5):1439-1449.

5. Finnell JT, Knopp R, Johnson P, Holland PC, Schubert W. A Calibrated Paper Clip Is a Reliable Measure of Two‐point Discrimination. Academic emergency medicine. 2004 Jun;11(6):710-4.

6. Two point discrimination. Science direct. Available from https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/agricultural-and-biological-sciences/two-point-discrimination#:~:text=Two%E2%80%90point%20discrimination%20is%20a,pain%20fibers%20rather%20than%20touch. [last accessed 25/01/2021]

7. O'Sullivan, Susan.Physical Rehabilitation Fifth Edition. Philadelphia: F.A. Davis Company. pp. 136–146.2007

8. G.Lundborg, Birgitta Rosen. The two point discrimination test, The Journal of Hand Surgery British & European Volume 29(5):418-22

9. Boldt, R., Gogulski, J., Gúzman-Lopéz, J. et al. Two-point tactile discrimination ability is influenced by temporal features of stimulation. Exp Brain Res 232, 2179–2185 (2014).

10. Example vedios. Two point discrimination tests. Available from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_f488-BNid8 [last accessed 25/01/2021]

11. kuhealthproffesions. 2 point discrimination. Available from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dB4gCv42ETw [last accessed 25/01/2021]

12. Vriens JP, Van der Glas HW. Extension of normal values on sensory function for facial areas using clinical tests on touch and two-point discrimination. International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery. 2009 Nov 1;38(11):1154-8.

13. Weinstein S. Intensive and extensive aspects of tactile sensitivity as a function of body part, sex and laterality. In: Kenshalo DR, ed. The skin senses. Springfield: Charles C.Thomas; 1968. p. 195-222.

14. Dellon AL, Mackinnon SE, Crosby PM. Reliability of two-point discrimination measurements. The Journal of hand surgery. 1987 Sep 1;12(5):693-6.

15. Elaine Ewing Fess, Karan S. Gettle, Cynthia A. Philips, J. Robin Janson, Hand and Upper Extremity Splinting (Third Edition),chapter Upper Extremity Assessment and Splinting, Mosby,2005,Pages 141-157,