top of page

Scapholunate Dissociation

Scapholunate dissociation (Scapholunate Dissociation, SLD) is the most common and clinically important ligament injury in the wrist. It occurs due to injury to the scapholunate ligament (SLL) and leads to instability between the scaphoid and lunate. Radiologically, this appears as an abnormally large gap between the bones – often referred to as the "Terry Thomas sign"¹–³.

Scafolunat dissosiasjon

Anatomy and Biomechanics

The scapholunate ligament is C-shaped and consists of three parts: volar, membranous, and dorsal. The dorsal portion is the strongest (260 N) and the most important stabilizer. The volar portion contributes to rotational stability (118 N), while the membranous middle portion is weak and avascular⁴.


Primary load paths through the wrist:

  • 50% of axial load passes via the radioscaphoid joint

  • 35% via the radiolunate joint

The injury often occurs because the scaphoid and lunate are forced in different directions under load. Secondary stabilizers include the scaphotrapeziotrapezoid ligament, scaphocapitate ligament, and dorsal intercarpal ligament².


Dynamic stabilizers include:

  • APL, ECRL, and FCU (via midcarpal supination)

  • FCR contributes to scaphoid flexion and capitate pronation



Epidemiology and Etiology

Ligamentinjury hand

Scapholunate instability is common after trauma – especially after a fall on an outstretched hand (FOOSH) with the wrist in extension and ulnar deviation. This produces an asymmetric force transmission between scaphoid and lunate⁵.

  • 5% of all wrist sprains involve concomitant SL injury

  • 13.4% of distal radius fractures are associated with SL injury – particularly chauffeur fractures and nondisplaced scaphoid fractures³

Overuse injuries also occur, for example with crutch use, prolonged static loading, or repetitive wrist extension².


Clinical Presentation

Patients often report:

  • Fall or trauma to the wrist in extension and ulnar deviation

  • Pain in the dorso-radial wrist, sometimes in the snuffbox region or scaphoid tubercle

  • Clicking, giving way, reduced grip strength, and swelling

  • Pain with loading, rotation, and gripping

Often, the patient initially has normal radiographs, and symptoms may develop over months.


Radiological Classification and Stages

Watson et al. defined four stages of instability based on radiographs⁸:

  • Pre-dynamic: Symptoms without visible damage

  • Dynamic instability: Pathological widening visible only on stress images

  • Static SL dissociation: Visible SL gap > 3 mm and SL angle > 70°

  • SLAC (Scapholunate Advanced Collapse): Progressive osteoarthritis


Radiological features:

  • PA radiograph: scapholunate gap > 3 mm (= pathological)

  • Lateral radiograph: scapholunate angle > 70°

  • Stress views (clenched fist, ulnar deviation) accentuate findings

  • MRI and CT are used in unclear cases


SLAC progression:

  • Osteoarthritis in the radial styloid

  • Radioscaphoid osteoarthritis

  • Capitolunate osteoarthritis

  • Pan-carpal osteoarthritis


Complications

Scapholunat ligament injury

Untreated scapholunate dissociation may lead to two main complications:

  • Scapholunate Advanced Collapse (SLAC)

  • Wrist osteoarthritis

SLAC is a progressive, specific form of degenerative arthropathy that develops in several stages, first involving the radial styloid and later radioscaphoid and capitolunate joints. The result is often considerable functional loss of the wrist if untreated³.


Examination

Palpation

  • Pain in the snuffbox or over the palmar scaphoid tubercle

  • Tenderness distal to Lister’s tubercle


Special tests

  • Watson’s test (Scaphoid shift maneuver):

    • Performed with the wrist in slight extension

    • Examiner places thumb over the scaphoid tubercle and moves the wrist from ulnar to radial deviation

    • Positive test: click and pain – sign of dorsal subluxation

  • Scapholunate Ballottement Test:

    • Stabilize the lunate and mobilize the scaphoid

    • Positive test: pain and excessive movement


Imaging

  • Standard radiographs: AP, lateral, clenched fist

  • Ulnar deviation to reveal dynamic instability


Important radiological findings:

  • SL gap > 3 mm (Terry Thomas sign)

  • SL angle > 60° (indicates dorsal intercalated segment instability – DISI)

  • Scaphoid ring sign

  • Disruption of Gilula’s lines


Differential Diagnoses

For ulnar-sided, dorsal, or volar wrist pain, other conditions must be excluded:

Dorsal wrist

  • SL injury, LTIL injury, DRUJ instability, occult ganglion, Kienböck’s, carpometacarpal boss, PIN irritation

Ulnar wrist

  • TFCC injury, ulnar impaction, FCU/ECU tendinitis, tendon subluxation

Radial wrist

  • De Quervain’s, intersection syndrome, scaphoid fracture, cheiralgia paresthetica

Volar wrist

  • Ganglion, carpal instability, pisotriquetral arthritis, Preiser’s disease

Palmar region

  • Carpal tunnel, ulnar neuritis, hamate hook fracture, Guyon’s canal compression


Outcome Measures

To assess function and progression in scapholunate dissociation, recommended measures include:

  • DASH (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand)

  • PRWE (Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation)


Medical Treatment

Treatment of scapholunate dissociation (SLD) offers several surgical options, but no clear gold standard exists. Studies and meta-analyses show large variation in technique and outcome reporting, and the surgeon’s experience often outweighs the specific procedure⁷ ⁹ ¹⁶.


Acute injuries (within 4–6 weeks):

  • Closed reduction + cast (8 weeks)

  • Closed or open reduction with percutaneous K-wires

  • Open reduction + direct SLL repair

  • Open reconstruction with tendon graft


Chronic injuries without arthritis:

  • Blatt capsulodesis

  • Scaphoid tenodesis

  • Tendon reconstruction of SLL

  • Scaphoid-trapezium-trapezoid fusion


Chronic SLD with arthritis (SLAC):

  • Proximal row carpectomy

  • Scaphoidectomy + four-corner fusion

  • Total wrist arthrodesis

Soft tissue reconstructions provide better biomechanical restoration but less viscoelasticity than the original ligament. Skeletal procedures (e.g. fusions) are more predictable but irreversible. Garcia-Elias et al. developed a treatment algorithm based on stage and patient function¹⁶.

Surgery usually provides good symptom relief, although full function is not always regained. Patients often report improved pain and function compared to conservative management⁹ ¹⁷.


Rehabilitation and Physiotherapy

Acute phase (non-operative):

  • Managed like an acute ankle ligament injury

  • Rest, avoid load, supportive bandage or orthosis

  • NSAIDs, hot/cold packs, contrast baths as needed

  • Avoid activities stressing the wrist in extension


Chronic phase (non-operative):

  • Focus on functional limitations: pain, reduced grip strength, reduced range of motion

  • Orthosis may be used during heavy activity

  • Patient education and activity modification


Post-surgery:

  • Cast up to 10 weeks, then gradual mobilization

  • Orthosis during physical load up to 1 year post-op


Rehabilitation timeline:

  • Return to activity: 4–6 months

  • Full function: up to 12–15 months⁴ ²¹


Effective Exercises

Dart throwing motion

Stabilization and neuromuscular control are crucial. A combination of proprioception and strength training provides the best results.

  • Reactivation of flexor carpi radialis (FCR) for scaphoid stability

  • Eccentric and concentric strength training with theraband

  • Hammer/club exercises for pronation and supination

  • Isometric strength for flexion/extension

  • “Prayer stretch” and mobilization in prayer position

  • Grip training with dynamometer – dosed to the contralateral side


Grepsstyrke Kit
Buy Now

Clinical Summary

Scapholunate dissociation is a common but often overlooked complication after FOOSH injuries. Many patients develop secondary conditions such as SLAC and osteoarthritis over time. The most evidence-based treatment is surgical, but no universal solution exists – choice of method should be based on stage and surgeon expertise.

Physiotherapy should be individualized and function-oriented, focusing on mobility, proprioception, and graded loading. Multidisciplinary follow-up provides the best outcomes.


Soruces:

  1. Duke Orthopaedics: Wheeless' Textbook of Orthopaedics. http://www.wheelessonline.com/ortho/scapholunate_instability (accessed 15 October 2011).

  2. Konopka G, Chim H. Optimal management of scapholunate ligament injuries. Orthopedic research and reviews. 2018;10:41.

  3. Andersson JK. Treatment of scapholunate ligament injury: current concepts. EFORT open reviews. 2017 Sep;2(9):382-93.

  4. Van Overstraeten L, Camus EJ, Wahegaonkar A, Messina J, Tandara AA, Binder AC, Mathoulin CL. Anatomical description of the dorsal capsulo-scapholunate septum (DCSS)—arthroscopic staging of scapholunate instability after DCSS sectioning. Journal of wrist surgery. 2013 May;2(02):149-54.

  5. Goelz L, Kim S, Güthoff C, Eichenauer F, Eisenschenk A, Mutze S, Asmus A. ACTION trial: a prospective study on diagnostic Accuracy of 4D CT for diagnosing Instable ScaphOlunate DissociatioN. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 Jan 15;22(1):84.

  6. Tomas A. Scapholunate Dissociation. Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy. 2018 Mar;48(3):225-.

  7. Lau S, Swarna SS, Tamvakopoulos GS. Scapholunate dissociation: an overview of the clinical entity and current treatment options. European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology. 2009 Aug 1;19(6):377-85.

  8. Konopka G, Chim H. Optimal management of scapholunate ligament injuries. Orthopedic research and reviews. 2018;10:41.

  9. Bloom HT, Freeland AE, Bowen V, Mrkonjic L. The Treatment of Chronic Scapholunate Dissociation: An Evidence-Based Assessment of the Literature. Orthopedics. 2003;26(2):195-203

  10. Andersson JK. Treatment of scapholunate ligament injury: current concepts. EFORT open reviews. 2017 Sep;2(9):382-93.

  11. Duke Orthopaedics: Wheeless' Textbook of Orthopaedics. http://www.wheelessonline.com/ortho/scapholunate_advanced_collapse_slac.

  12. Opreanu RC, Baulch M, Katranji A. Reduction and maintenance of scapholunate dissociation using the TwinFix screw. Eplasty. 2009;9.

  13. Watson's Test. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Watson%27s_test. (accessed 24 October 2011).

  14. Imada AO, Welch K, Mlady G, Moneim MSA. The tangential view described by Moneim to demonstrate scapholunate dissociation: an update. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2022.

  15. Jacobson MD, Plancher KD. Evaluation of hand and wrist injuriesin athletes. Operative Techniques in Sports Medicine. 1996 Oct 1;4(4):210-26.

  16. Garcia-Elias M, Lluch AL, Stanley JK. Three-ligament tenodesis for the treatment of scapholunate dissociation: indications and surgical technique. The Journal of hand surgery. 2006 Jan 1;31(1):125-34.

  17. Caloia M, Caloia H, Pereira E. Arthroscopic scapholunate joint reduction. Is an effective treatment for irreparable scapholunate ligament tears?. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®. 2012 Apr 1;470(4):972-8.

  18. Wolff AL, Wolfe SW. Rehabilitation for scapholunate injury: application of scientific and clinical evidence to practice. Journal of Hand Therapy. 2016 Apr 1;29(2):146-53.

  19. Capele A, et al. Mayo Clinic Health Letter - Tools for Healthier Lives. 2011;29(1):1-3. Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research, 200 first St. SW, Rochester, MN 55905.http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20110117005129/en/Mayo-Clinic-Health-Letter-January-2011-Reducing Accessed: November 27th, 2011.

  20. Salvà-Coll G, Garcia-Elias M, Llusá-Pérez M, Rodríguez-Baeza A. The role of the flexor carpi radialis muscle in scapholunate instability. The Journal of hand surgery. 2011 Jan 1;36(1):31-6.

  21. Goldberg SH, Strauch RE, Rosenwasser MP. Scapholunate and lunotriquetral instability in the athlete: Diagnosis and management. Operative Techniques in Sports Medicine. 2006 Apr 1;14(2):108-21

Tip: Use Ctrl + F to search on the page.

Help us keep PhysioDock free

All content on PhysioDock is free – but it costs to keep it running.

PhysioDock is built to be an open and accessible platform for physiotherapists, students, and patients alike. Here you’ll find articles, measurement tools, exercise libraries, diagnostic resources, and professional materials – all completely free.

Behind the scenes, however, there are hundreds of hours of work: research, writing, development, design, maintenance, testing, and updates. We do this because we believe in open knowledge and better health information.

If you’d like to support our work and help us continue developing and improving PhysioDock, we truly appreciate everyone who:
– subscribes to a PhysioDock+ membership
– uses and recommends PhysioDock in their work or studies
– shares PhysioDock with others

Every contribution makes a difference – and helps us keep the platform open to everyone.
Thank you for supporting PhysioDock!

Best value

PhysioDock+

NOK 199

199

Every month

PhysioDock+ gives you exclusive benefits such as discounts, AI tools, and professional resources. The membership helps you work more efficiently, stay updated, and save time and money in your daily practice.

Valid until canceled

Access to Fysio-Open

Physionews+

Quizzes

10% discount on all purchases

5% discount on "Website for Your Clinic"

50% discount on shipping

Access to PhysioDock-AI (Under development)

Partner discounts

Exclusive product discounts

Contact us

Is something incorrect?

Something missing?
Something you’d like to see added?
More recent literature?

Feel free to get in touch and let us know which article it concerns and what could be improved.
We truly appreciate your feedback!

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram

Thanks for contributing!

bottom of page